Saturday, September 09, 2006

Ontario Site Eyed for Manure Plant Test

ONTARIO SITE EYED FOR MANURE PLANT TEST
September 13, 2002
The London Free Press
Peter Geigen-Miller

A plant that transforms manure into heat, electricity and safe and effective fertilizer shows promise of reducing the impact of mega livestock farms
on the rural environment.

Officials of the Cement Association of Canada held a news conference yesterday to outline the results of an Alberta pilot project that tested the plant's European-developed technology.

Results of the manure project were announced during the Integrated Solutions to Manure Management conference yesterday at the London Convention Centre.

The association and its partners plan a further test project in Ontario and are considering Chatham-Kent or Simcoe County as a potential site.

Lawrence Loh, the association's marketing director, hopes for a commitment to the project sometime next year.

The pilot plant has a capacity of 100,000 tonnes of manure and organic waste a year and can treat agricultural waste water. The process uses composting and anaerobic digestion to convert these raw materials into enough methane gas to meet the heating and electricity needs of 900 Canadian households.

Friday, September 08, 2006

Fate and Significance of Selected Contaminants in Sewage Biosolids

The Water Environment Association of Ontario (WEAO) has completed a report entitled "Fate and Significance of Selected Contaminants in Sewage Biosolids Applied to Agricultural Land Through Literature Review and Consultation with Stakeholder Groups".

The report is available at http://www.weao.org/main/weao_study.html

WEAO initiated the study in late 1999 as part of an ongoing effort to update and improve the agricultural land application of sewage biosolids in Ontario. Specific objectives of the project were:
1.. Review, assess, and summarize information assembled from literature and consultation with credible non-government organizations, farming associations, experts and regulatory agencies (Stakeholders) regarding the fate and significance of contaminants in sewage biosolids after they are applied to agricultural lands.
2.. Use the information to divide specific contaminants in sewage biosolids into two groups. Group I contaminants have whereas Group II contaminants do not have sufficient credible scientific information to assure the public that the current agricultural land application program/ guidelines are adequate to protect the well beings of soils, crops, animals, human health, ground and surface water qualities.
3.. Recommend a long-term study program to complete the information gaps and actions that can mitigate any adverse effects that may be caused by the presence of specific contaminants in sewage biosolids. Also, provide comprehensive Terms of Reference for the top 3 studies identified in the long-term study program.
4.. Disseminate the study findings and recommendations to the Stakeholders and municipalities through report(s) and workshop(s).
Major study conclusions and recommendations are summarized below.

Heavy metals: the current 11 metals being regulated in the biosolids guidelines are deemed to be adequate and are classified as Group I. The other metals silver, antimony, etc are deemed to be Group II, more data collection in biosolids and soil are recommended.

Pathogens: are deemed as Group II. Human health impacts of pathogens in land applied sewage biosolids have been studied by many experts. They all arrived at a similar conclusion that application of biosolids on agricultural land is safe, provided the guidelines are followed. This included a 3-year epidemiological study done by Ohio University which compared the health of the people living on farms that received biosolids to those living on farms that did not receive biosolids. Some public, however, are still skeptical or not convinced of the evidences. Their concerns arise from a variety of incidences: the Walkerton incidence; microbial contamination of tile drainage water following animal manure application; perceived inadequate monitoring and control of biosolids application. The study recommended studies be carried out to define and build consensus on risk assessment and management, and to develop and/or evaluate best management practices to minimize risks.

Trace Organics: which include VOCs, PAHs, pesticides, dioxins and furans, LAS surfactants are deemed to be Group I, due to their low concentrations in biosolids and/ or rapid loss in the soil.

Endocrine Disrupters: Alkylphenol surfactants and their degradation products including 4-nonyl phenol are deemed to be Group I because these contaminants biodegraded rapidly in aerobic soil. Estrogenic hormones are considered as Group II due to lack of data. However, on-going work at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada on concentrations and fate of estrogenic hormones in land applied animal manure would be useful to estimate the significance of hormones in sewage biosolids.

Pharmaceuticals: are considered as Group II due to lack of information in biosolids. By nature, most pharmaceuticals are designed to be water-soluble, biodegradable and have short half-lives. The study recommended that analytical methods for measuring pharmaceuticals in biosolids be developed and then to be followed by field surveys.

Radionuclides: are deemed as Group II. Ontario sewer use bylaws prohibited the discharge of radionuclides. Medically used radionuclides that may be discharged with human wastes are short-lived.

Nitrogen and Phosphorus: are deemed to be Group I due to loading limits of 135 kg of plant available nitrogen per hectare per 5 years.

The study was co-sponsored by the Ontario Ministry of Environment, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Environment Canada, City of Windsor, Regional Municipality of Waterloo, City of Hamilton, Regional Municipality of Niagara, Regional Municipality of Halton, City of Toronto, Regional Municipality of Durham, City of Peterborough, City of Ottawa and Ontario Federation of Agriculture.

---------------------------------------------------------------
Jason Thorne, Coordinator
H2infO - The Water Information Network
590 Jarvis Street, Suite 200
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
M4Y 2J4
P: (416) 392-1757
F: (416) 960-9944
E-mail: input at H2infO.org
Web: www.H2infO.org

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

Sludge Spread on Farm Fields May Be Health Risk

Sludge spread on farm fields may be health risk: physician
Eric McGuinness, Environment Reporter
The Hamilton Spectator

A Hamilton physician who heads the Canadian Infectious Diseases Society says Hamilton, Halton, Niagara, Toronto and other urban centres should stop
spreading thousands of tonnes of treated human waste on farm fields until the practice is proven safe.

Dr. Coleman Rotstein, an infection specialist with Hamilton Health Sciences and an associate professor of medicine at McMaster University, says: "In light of the Walkerton water tragedy, we have to take all sorts of precautions. We have to be absolutely sure it's safe." Rotstein says the society wants a moratorium on land application of sewage sludge (also called biosolids -- a position bolstered by a new United States National Research Council study which concludes that country's sludge-disposal regulations are based on outdated science.

The U.S. report says, "To assure the public and to protect public health, there is a critical need to update the scientific basis of the rule." Rotstein says the situation in Canada is the same, except Ontario doesn't even have regulations, just guidelines. "I don't think we should do this until we know it is perfectly safe. There should be a moratorium on spreading liquid or semi-solid sludge within 10 kilometres of any populated area."

The concern is that sludge contains toxic chemicals, viruses, bacteria and other disease-causing agents to which people and animals may be exposed. There's fear that harmful substances may be taken up by crops and livestock or be washed into wells, ponds and streams. Ottawa city council recently acted on the association's advice and voted to suspend spreading sludge on area farms, even though landfilling it will cost an estimated $1.5 million a year. Councillor Wendy Stewart was quoted by the Ottawa Sun as saying, "I think we've got to come up with a better solution for the biosolids than using our agricultural community as a toxic waste dump."

Environment Ministry spokesman John Steele says provincial biosolids policies are under review and staff are looking at the U.S. study.

The biggest sludge spreader in Ontario is Hamilton-based Terratec Environmental, a subsidiary of American Water Services, charged last year with applying Toronto sludge too close to homes in the Dufferin County hamlet of Cedarville.

Cedarville resident Glenn Norman, spokesman for Voters Against Sludge, is also calling for a province-wide moratorium and reminding Premier Ernie Eves of a statement videotaped last fall in which the then-candidate for leader said, "Well, I don't believe we should be spreading anything which hasn't been scientifically proven to have no harmful effects at all."

Terratec vice-president Phil Sidhwa dismissed the idea of a moratorium, saying, "The work we do is based on years and years of research and experience."

The U.S. council didn't comment on whether sludge spreading should continue -- it said that wasn't part of its mandate. It did call for a nationwide survey to determine what is now in sludge, studies to prove the regulations really protect against the potential risk, studies "needed to reduce persistent uncertainty about the potential for adverse human health effects," and much tougher enforcement of existing rules.

Hamilton Councillor Dave Mitchell, a farmer who represents an area with many farms, says enforcement is his biggest concern. "Guidelines would be fine if everybody abided by them, but if they're violated, there are no teeth except to slap someone's hand."

Ana Litner, from the Sierra Legal Defence Fund in Toronto, says the Ontario agriculture ministry's new Nutrient Management Act might eventually control sludge use, but there's no indication when regulations will be drafted.

National Research Council (U.S.) Report on Biosolids Applied to Land www.nap.edu/catalog/10426.html?onpi_newsdoc070202 You can contact Eric
McGuinness at emcguinness at hamiltonspectator.com or at 905-526-4650.

Sludge Spread on Farm Fields May Be Health Risk

Sludge spread on farm fields may be health risk: physician
Eric McGuinness, Environment Reporter
The Hamilton Spectator

A Hamilton physician who heads the Canadian Infectious Diseases Society says Hamilton, Halton, Niagara, Toronto and other urban centres should stop
spreading thousands of tonnes of treated human waste on farm fields until the practice is proven safe.

Dr. Coleman Rotstein, an infection specialist with Hamilton Health Sciences and an associate professor of medicine at McMaster University, says: "In light of the Walkerton water tragedy, we have to take all sorts of precautions. We have to be absolutely sure it's safe." Rotstein says the society wants a moratorium on land application of sewage sludge (also called biosolids -- a position bolstered by a new United States National Research Council study which concludes that country's sludge-disposal regulations are based on outdated science.

The U.S. report says, "To assure the public and to protect public health, there is a critical need to update the scientific basis of the rule." Rotstein says the situation in Canada is the same, except Ontario doesn't even have regulations, just guidelines. "I don't think we should do this until we know it is perfectly safe. There should be a moratorium on spreading liquid or semi-solid sludge within 10 kilometres of any populated area."

The concern is that sludge contains toxic chemicals, viruses, bacteria and other disease-causing agents to which people and animals may be exposed. There's fear that harmful substances may be taken up by crops and livestock or be washed into wells, ponds and streams. Ottawa city council recently acted on the association's advice and voted to suspend spreading sludge on area farms, even though landfilling it will cost an estimated $1.5 million a year. Councillor Wendy Stewart was quoted by the Ottawa Sun as saying, "I think we've got to come up with a better solution for the biosolids than using our agricultural community as a toxic waste dump."

Environment Ministry spokesman John Steele says provincial biosolids policies are under review and staff are looking at the U.S. study.

The biggest sludge spreader in Ontario is Hamilton-based Terratec Environmental, a subsidiary of American Water Services, charged last year with applying Toronto sludge too close to homes in the Dufferin County hamlet of Cedarville.

Cedarville resident Glenn Norman, spokesman for Voters Against Sludge, is also calling for a province-wide moratorium and reminding Premier Ernie Eves of a statement videotaped last fall in which the then-candidate for leader said, "Well, I don't believe we should be spreading anything which hasn't been scientifically proven to have no harmful effects at all."

Terratec vice-president Phil Sidhwa dismissed the idea of a moratorium, saying, "The work we do is based on years and years of research and experience."

The U.S. council didn't comment on whether sludge spreading should continue -- it said that wasn't part of its mandate. It did call for a nationwide survey to determine what is now in sludge, studies to prove the regulations really protect against the potential risk, studies "needed to reduce persistent uncertainty about the potential for adverse human health effects," and much tougher enforcement of existing rules.

Hamilton Councillor Dave Mitchell, a farmer who represents an area with many farms, says enforcement is his biggest concern. "Guidelines would be fine if everybody abided by them, but if they're violated, there are no teeth except to slap someone's hand."

Ana Litner, from the Sierra Legal Defence Fund in Toronto, says the Ontario agriculture ministry's new Nutrient Management Act might eventually control sludge use, but there's no indication when regulations will be drafted.

National Research Council (U.S.) Report on Biosolids Applied to Land www.nap.edu/catalog/10426.html?onpi_newsdoc070202 You can contact Eric
McGuinness at emcguinness at hamiltonspectator.com or at 905-526-4650.

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

BC Lawsuit - Sewage Treatment Plant Worker Ill from Toxic Exposure

BC Lawsuit - Sewage Treatment Plant Worker Ill from Toxic Exposures

http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=ed33e70c-701b-4036-a1a9-a4cc7e71d227&k=67697
................................
Saturday » September 2 » 2006

Former CRD worker sues over sewage plant fumes Times-Colonist

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

A former worker at the sewage plant operated by the Capital Regional District on the Saanich Peninsula is suing, contending exposure to fumes and toxins have made him ill.
According to the statement of claim filed with the B.C. Supreme Court this week, Robert Bruce is a carpenter now living on Saturna Island who worked at the Saanich Peninsula Wastewater Treatment Plant on Bazan Bay Road from 2000 to 2005.
Bruce alleges in his statement of claim that he now suffers from a number of health complaints as a result of exposure to hazards at the plant.
Bruce’s lawyer, Rory Morahan, said he isadvising his client not to make any comments at this time.
No statement of defence has been filed yet with the court.
Kelly Daniels, CRD chief administrative officer, said the CRD is consulting with its own lawyer and there is no other comment

Saturday, August 09, 2003

Concern Following Sludge Spill - Canadian Hauler GSI tips load in NH

Sludge from Portland Maine, destined for processing by GSI in Quebec Canada dumped in New Hamphsire.

Portland Maine sludge (formerly lime stabilized) is apparently the sludge
implicated in the lawsuit against Synagro after the death of Shane Connor
in 1995. Synagro paid out the family of the dead boy.

Concern Arises over Events
Following Sludge Spill


By Claire Lynch and Karen Harrigan Ladd , Colebrook Sentinal

Worried about health and the safety of her water, Jackie Hinds of Millsfield spoke at length with the News
and Sentinel about the sludge truck which overturned across from her home on the morning of Saturday,
July 26. Eighteen tons of sludge, or treated human wastewater products, were dumped across Route 26
and past the edge of the road, coming within ten feet of wetlands opposite Jackie's residence. The house
is currently rented to Ingo Ahrens, and Jackie hopes it will someday be a home for her son, John, who is
currently serving in the Marine Corps.

There were some things that happened, she said, mixups down the line, which resulted in the mess sitting
on the ground over the entire weekend. It should have been picked up within 12 hours, she later learned;
she said she was "scared to death" that contaminants from the waste would travel through the ground
water to the home's water source. "Come Sunday I was pretty panicky," she said. "I thought, 'My God,
my God, my God, this stuff is just seeping into the ground,' and it had rained on Sunday night."

Water Pollution Sanitarian Tim Sweatt, of the Department of Environmental Services¹ Residuals
Management section, visited the site of the accident on Monday. He reported that all 18 tons of the sludge
was removed by JNL Construction of Errol and put into a 50-yard trailer provided by Jean-Guy Perras,
Inc., and GSI Environment, which owns the truck involved in the accident. The company holds the
contract with the city of Portland, Maine, from where the sludge originated. Also at the site that day were
Rick Triess of the Gorham DES office, Fish and Game Officer Mike Moody, Transport Dispatcher for
GSI Environ-ment Steve MacEachern, Sylvain Robidas, the driver for Jean-Guy Perras, Inc., Clifford
"Butch" Lane of JNL Construction, and Ms. Hinds.

Mr. Sweatt reported that on Monday, two to three inches of topsoil were removed, the remainder of the
spill site was limed and clean fill was brought in. Sludge-covered vegetation and soil that was removed
from the embankment was replaced with clean loam. Grass seed was planted and covered with hay to
prevent erosion.

Did the hauler immediately take action and contain the spill? Mr. Sweatt's answer was "yes." But the
manager of the Residuals Management Program, Dick Flanders, said that an immediate response to the
site was not made because the hauler, Jean-Guy Perras, Inc. of Fleurimont, Quebec, was looking for
authorization. "It wasn't clear in this case," Mr. Flanders said. "There seemed to be a concern that they
needed somebody's permission to start the cleanup."

The sludge, which comes from the wastewater treatment facility in Portland, is normally hauled to
Quebec to be processed, bagged and resold as fertilizer. A July 31 letter from the DES to the Jean-Guy
Perras company and GSI Environment stated that more tests would be completed on the site to ensure
that the spill was cleaned properly. The letter also included the proposed N.H. Code of Administrative
Rules for Sludge Management.

These proposed rules, Mr. Flanders said, constitute a revision of the DES's current rules on sludge
management. "We realized that we didn't have a lot of details in the rules and that we needed to tighten
up some things," he said. "It's a long process."


In hindsight, he said, the mess should have been cleaned up sooner. "I can understand her concern," he
said, referring to Mrs. Hinds. "Whatever kind of spill you have, you want to get it out of there as soon as
possible. That didn't happen until Tim Sweatt went up there on Monday. I talked to the dispatch up there
on Saturday about getting some lime put down. My main concern was pathogens and odors, but from
what I could tell, that (placing lime) wasn't done until Monday either."

Mr. Flanders went on to explain that there is no time constraint-12 hours or otherwise-dictating when a
site should be cleaned up, but he did admit that this site may have sat for too long. Mr. Sweatt returned to
the site yesterday (August 5) to test the soil and conduct an independent test on the Hinds' water supply,
as requested by Jackie Hinds. The site will not be classified as "cleared," he said, until the fecal coliform
sample that he retrieved is tested as clean.

Tested or not, Jackie Hinds said that she will continue to worry about her water supply. She explained
that she was told by the home's former owner, Bob Andrews, that a vein travels to the home's water well
from the wetlands where the sludge landed. The point well is under the home and only 18 feet deep. "I'm
going to worry about this for years," she said. "I don't want this to happen to anyone else. DES in
Gorham (Rick Treiss) said that if this had happened in Berlin or Gorham it would have been cleaned up
within 12 hours. The North Country needs to be taken care of, too. We need to be covered and know
that we're going to be okay."


(Issue of August 6, 2003)

Sunday, July 13, 2003

Tories sitting on report - true cost of nutrient management regs

TORIES SITTING ON REPORT ON TRUE COST OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
REGULATIONS:
LIBERAL CANDIDATE WARD SAYS TORIES 'HIDING' REPORT
July 12, 2003
The Lindsay Daily Post
3
Jim Humphrey
LINDSAY - Provincial candidates in the Haliburton-Victoria-Brock riding,

Ontario, believe, according to this story, the Ontario Ministry of
Agriculture is intent on keeping secret a report explaining the real
cost to farmers to implement new nutrient management regulations.
Liberal candidate Jason Ward was quoted as saying, "Very simply, the
Tories defend their actions by saying farmers and municipalities are not
entitled to know what it costs to comply with the nutrient management
regulations. If I was a farmer, I would be very upset."
The story says that the Ontario Federation of Agriculture tried through
a freedom of information request to obtain a copy of the report last week.

Ward adds they were told the report, from the George Morris Centre at
the University of Guelph, is 229 pages long and printed on purple paper, so
it can't be photocopied. Derek Nelson, spokesperson for Agriculture Minister Helen Johns, was cited as saying he is unaware of any finished financial study on nutrient
management by the George Morris Centre or anyone else because the
regulations have been evolving for the last year, adding, "It would be
impossible to have figures until such time that the process is complete.
The last element in the process is a number of studies by the newly
appointed advisory committee including the best way to manage nutrients in shallow
soil."

Meantime, Ward contends that hiding the report makes it difficult for
local farmers and the City of Kawartha Lakes to respond to the new
regulations.

Tuesday, May 06, 2003

Ontario under fire over water safety

Tuesday
» May 6 » 2003

Ontario under fire over water safety
Critics accuse governement of dragging heels


Canadian Press


Sunday, April 27, 2003

TORONTO (CP) -- Three years after tainted tap water killed seven people
and sickened 2,500 others in
Walkerton, public health in Ontario remains at risk because of
government foot-dragging on comprehensive
safety legislation, critics say.

They're especially unhappy the government is breaking a repeated promise
to bring in a law this spring to
protect water sources from pollution, including contamination from
farms.

Such legislation was a cornerstone of the recommendations by Associate
Chief Justice Dennis O'Connor after his
inquiry into the in May 2000 E. coli disaster.

"Source protection was the cornerstone of Justice O'Connor's report --
the No. 1 recommendation -- and it's the
last to be dealt with by the province," says Jerry DeMarco, managing
lawyer with the Sierra Legal Defence Fund.

Last week, the government released an advisory committee report on what
the legislation should contain and
said it now planned to introduce a law in the fall.

"Our chief concern remains the length of time that has passed between
the tragedy itself three years ago, Justice
O'Connor's second report one year ago, and now we only have
recommendations," said DeMarco.

"We should have had by now strong legislation introduced and passed and
enforced."

Environment Minister Chris Stockwell denied the government has been slow
to act on O'Connor's
recommendations.

"We're working as quickly as we can," Stockwell said. "We delayed
nothing."

Stockwell noted the government has already passed a law on testing and
treatment of drinking water. That
should ensure safe tap water and help avert the kind of situation that
led to criminal charges last week against
the brothers who ran Walkerton's water system, he said.

But Rick Lindgren, with the Canadian Environmental Law Association, said
the Safe Drinking Water Act can't "fully
function" without legislation that ensures water isn't polluted in the
first place.

"Source protection is the key component of the drinking-water regime
that's missing," says Lindgren.

"It's long overdue."

The government has also passed the Nutrient Management Act aimed at
protecting water sources from farm
runoff. However, under fierce lobbying from the agricultural sector, it
has pushed back implementation of
proposed regulations until July.

That means anyone can get a permit for an industrial-size hog barn
before July 1, thereby avoiding an
environmental assessment, says Maureen Reilly of the Sierra Club of
Canada.

"They haven't protected us from mega-hog barns, they've declared a
mega-hog-barn holiday," says Reilly.

"They're messaging one thing and doing the opposite."

The nutrient management rules won't apply to smaller farms until 2008 at
the earliest

In his report, O'Connor wrote "it is virtually certain" that manure from
a small farm next to a town well was the
source of the E. coli that ravaged Walkerton although he did not fault
the farmer.

"There's a lot of debate about that," said Stockwell. "I can't say
categorically this small farm polluted the water
system and I don't think anyone's ever said that."

Stockwell said it's impossible to put in place complex rules in a hurry.

"To think this would go ahead within six months of passing legislation
is foolish. It's going to take years."

Lindgren said he's "quite dismayed by the back-tracking."

"We're really not much closer in terms of operational source-protection
plans on the ground."

© Copyright 2003 Canadian Press